Two paths that began independently but converged in the 20th century.
Paths converge around the time of von Neumann architecture
Here's an xor circuit:
Last time we saw that there were 9 logical properties that are of interest. Here we should reflect on why we care about such properties, which can be demonstrated by a formal proof, which can't, and why.
. | Shown by considering all possibilities or by formal proof | Shown by example or instance |
---|---|---|
Argument | Valid if for every possibility, if the premises are true, the conclusion is also true. Derive the conclusion from the premises. | Invalid if in at least one case the premises are true and the conclusion is false |
Set of sentences | Jointly impossible if in every possibility at least one sentence is false. Derive a contradiction from the sentences | Jointly possible if in at least one case all are true |
Pair of sentences | Equivalent if in every possibility they have the same truth value. Derive first sentence from the second and vice versa | Not equivalent if they differ in truth value in at least one cases |
Sentence | Necessarily true if true in every possibility (derive with no premises) and necessarily false if false (derive a contradiction from the sentence) in every possibility | Contingent if true in at least one case and false in at least one case (two examples) |
Today, more practice working through the worksheet, using the formal proof/example method.